Elective surgery waiting time prioritisation to improve population health gains and reduce health inequalities
Elective surgery waiting time prioritisation to improve population health gains and reduce health inequalities
Project theme: Applied economic evaluation and policy analysis
This is a joint project with the Economics of Health Systems and Interface with Social Care Policy Research Unit (ESHCRU). Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, elective activity in NHS hospitals has reduced substantially due to patients avoiding care and hospitals cancelling scheduled treatments to create capacity for the rapid surge in COVID-19 patients. With elective activity still below pre-pandemic levels, the backlog of patients with unmet needs is growing constantly and, as a result, waiting lists have reached historically high levels [1].
Traditionally, the English NHS has operated a universal waiting time target of 18 weeks from referral to surgery for most elective surgeries (with a few exceptions such as cancer surgery). This approach fails to reflect the different health effects and opportunity costs of delaying different types of elective care. If patient populations differ in the benefits they obtain from more rapid access to elective surgeries (e.g. due to disease progression / irreversibilities), a targeted waiting time policy that sets different maximum waiting times for different elective interventions can improve population health and help the NHS ‘to build back better’.
Two recent studies have examined approaches for prioritising patients for elective surgeries [2,3]. Gravesteijn et al (2021) modelled the health consequences, measured in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), of delaying 43 types of elective surgeries in the Netherlands during the COVID-19 pandemic [3]. The impact of varying delays for each procedure was estimated using a common model reflecting the impacts of surgery on survival and quality of life pre and post-surgery. The analysis did not consider resource requirements of surgery or the best approach to prioritise surgery. D’Aeth et al (2021) proposed a linear programming approach to optimise schedules in order to minimise years of life lost in England [2]. The model captures the impact of COVID-19 on capacity and the availability of resources for elective care and used historical data to estimate demand. The negative impact of delays in elective care are captured by a risk of progression resulting in emergency care. However, the study only captured impact on life years and thus fails to reflect the impacts of delays on morbidity. Neither study considered the impacts on inequalities.
Our research will aim to examine the relationship between waiting times and health outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for different elective surgeries conditional on the characteristics of the patients (including equity-relevant characteristics). i Using this evidence we will explore alternative prioritisation strategies for tackling waiting lists considering the dual objectives of maximising population health and reducing health inequalities.
This research aims to inform efficient referral-to-treatment (RTT) targets for types of elective surgery by:
i) Estimating the current backlog in elective surgery
ii) Estimating how variation in waiting time across forms of elective surgery has changed because of the pandemic
iii) Quantifying the health consequences of waiting by condition in terms of QALYs and describe this alongside the characteristics of the patient population for each condition (including equity relevant characteristics)
iv) Explore the impacts of alternative prioritisation strategies for tackling waiting lists on population health and health inequalities
Simon Walker, Nils Gutacker (ESCHRU), Susan Griffin and Naomi Gibb
1. Griffin S. COVID-19: waiting times in England reach record highs. BMJ. 2020;370:m3557.
2. D’Aeth JC, Ghosal S, Grimm F, Haw D, Koca E, Lau K, et al. Optimal national prioritization policies for hospital care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Nat Comput Sci. 2021;1–11. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43588-021-00111-1
3. Gravesteijn B, Krijkamp E, Busschbach J, Geleijnse G, Helmrich IR, Bruinsma S, et al. Minimizing Population Health Loss in Times of Scarce Surgical Capacity During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Crisis and Beyond: A Modeling Study. Value in Health. 2021;24:648–57. Available from: http://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098301521000462/fulltext
Gibbs, NK., Griffin, S., Gutacker, N., Villasenor-Lopez, A., Walker, S. (2024) Elective surgery waiting time prioritisation to improve population health gains and reduce health inequalities. Policy Research Unit in Economic Evaluation of Health and Social Care Interventions. Universities of Sheffield and York. Report 071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15131/shef.data.25219343
Gibbs, NK., Griffin, S., Gutacker, N., Villasenor-Lopez, A., Walker, S. (2023) A general modelling framework to estimate the impact of waiting times on health for patients undergoing elective procedures in the NHS in England. Policy Research Unit in Economic Evaluation of Health and Social Care Interventions. Universities of Sheffield and York. Report 070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15131/shef.data.25219328
Gibbs NK, Griffin S, Gutacker N, Villaseñor A, Walker S. The Health Impact of Waiting for Elective Procedures in the NHS in England: A Modeling Framework Applied to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and Total Hip Replacement. Medical Decision Making. 2024;44(5):572-585. doi:10.1177/0272989X241256639
Summary of works
Summary of waiting times work [EEPRU/ESHCRU]
CHE Research Summary 24
Waiting for surgery: should waiting times be the same for all procedures?